Email and Directions
Recent Speaking Engagements

Need a speaker for your club, clients, Church or civic group, etc.? We're glad to speak at no charge.

October 24, 2010
George will present "What Every Non-Estate Planning Attorney Should Know about Death and Disability Planning."  Continuing Legal Education credits are pending approval.  Call our office for details. 

August 11, 2010
George gave a presentation called "Now you see it, now you don't, here it comes again: the Estate Tax Picture" to the Men's Forum at Big Canoe.

March 29, 2010
George & Claire spoke on “Grantor Trust Strategies” for the Private Bankers and other Bank Executives at Fidelity Bank

February 19, 2010
George spoke on “Bedrock Asset Protection” for the Big Canoe Home Owners Association

February 4, 2010
in Boca Raton, FL George spoke on “Cutting Edge Tools for Troubled Times” for AXA/Equitable Agents Reinsurance Company (EARC) meeting

January 28, 2010
George  & Claire spoke on “Do I really have to mess with this now?” at a Wells Fargo "Lunch and Learn"

 



 

Topicals

Deal with inherited real estate before another person dies.
Ignoring property to be inherited
is a problem which never goes away. It inevitably gets worse. (read more) 

Who will make your financial decisions if you are unable to make them yourself?
What good is having access to
a safe deposit box if you don’t
have the key and you’re not on
the signature card? (read more)

After a death, don't rush anything.
Memo to someone who has just lost a loved one: don’t rush the net. (read more)



They said "Feel free to share this."

Dear George,
I have been searching for someone with your knowledge of asset protection for years. You are the only ones who knew what you were talking about.

Dear George,
This is a letter I have wanted to write to you for some time to thank you and your staff for helping us transfer our N.C. property to our girls when we did. (read more)


The latest article:

Entries in Wills (2)

Friday
Mar182011

The Pet Trust: Protecting your animal after you're gone

The widowed aunt had written in her Will: "I give $5,000 to [nephew] if he takes care of my cat." 

The nephew put the cat to sleep.  He then demanded the five grand from his aunt’s estate. His reason: "I took care of the cat.” 

They ended up in court.  And the judge wisely decided that what the aunt had meant by taking care of the cat was markedly different from what the nephew claimed she meant. 

Now before you groan, it would only be fair to tell you the other side of the case. A witness testified how much the aunt had loved her cat.

But there was also evidence that the aunt knew that her nephew didn’t like her cat at all. So the aunt was picking a fight by putting this provision in her will.

We all can wince at incidents like these. They can be avoided:  Rule #1: Don’t entrust your pet’s care to someone who hates your pet.  Rule #2: Don’t leave your pet to someone who’s allergic to your pet. You get the idea. 

A much better route: create a Pet Trust.  A new statute now allows for them.  And a court can be used to oversee what you provide in the Trust.

Here’s the big picture:

You can choose the right person to receive a bequest to provide for your animal if you are dead or disabled. You can even provide for a succession of persons.

Or you can provide for one person to provide a home and care for your animal, using funds which you’ve entrusted to another person to hold, invest, etc. (“My pet is to live with X, and my trustee shall give X the  funds to pay for all the expenses of caring for my pet.”)

And yes, the Georgia Code allows for a trust to provide for the care of more than one animal. 

Now in “human” trusts, the beneficiary can go to court if the trustee is not abiding by the trust’s terms.  Or the trustee can seek a judge’s help if the beneficiary is missing,  or the trustee is concerned about distributions to a beneficiary being squandered on drugs. 

And if alive, a trust’s creator (i.e., the “grantor” or “trustor”) can ask for a court’s help if this person thinks that the trust isn’t being administered according to his or her wishes.

It’s not this easy in a Pet Trust.   Your pet is never, ever going to file a suit for a protective order, or to ask for a change in guardian. This isn’t some courtroom scene out of a cartoon, the Honorable Scooby-Doo presiding.

But Georgia law does provide that any person who’s interested in an animal’s welfare can go into court on the animal’s behalf.

This caring soul could ask the court to change the trustee because the trustee isn’t doing what the trust specifies.  Or if someone named in the Pet Trust needs to be replaced for any other good reason.

Here’s one big caution, though. The Pet Trust terms need to be done correctly and will need to be integrated with your other legal documents.  This doesn’t happen in a fill-in-the-blank form

And no form language covers the situation if your pet is a horse, coatimundi, or spider.

Bottom line: if you want the law to help protect your pet if you’re gone, or if you’re totally disabled and not able to care for your pet, now you have a way.

Monday
Dec062010

Who gets the assets if your spouse dies without a will? You might be surprised.

 

The financial planner thought he knew everything.  And with that confidence, he downloaded a form will. It wasn’t a bad will, actually. But he made one enormous mistake: he didn’t sign it right.

So when he died, his wife went to an attorney to find out how she would collect everything. She got a shock: she wasn’t going to. The will was useless. Void. Non-existent. Consequently, the law says that she and the child had to split the assets. The scorecard: Child: 50%. Mother 50%. Game, set, match.

Would it matter if it was his child, and not their child? Not a whit. Could they fudge the distribution? Nope.

What if parent and child didn’t get along? Doesn’t matter. They were chained legally to 50% each. They may not have spoken in years . . . but now they sure were going to.

The key: if the once-good will is not good now, or if there’s no will, then the spouse and the children divide the estate assets equally. Example: Remarried mother has two children from her first marriage. She dies with a faux will. We have three people, right? Two kids plus spouse. Since the will is garbage, each child inherits one-third of the dead mother’s assets. The surviving husband gets the final one-third.

There’s a small legal protection for the surviving spouse: he or she can’t get less than one-third.

What this means: imagine that Snow White married the prince, they adopted the seven dwarfs, and then he died sans will. Snow White gets one-third of the prince’s assets, and the seven dwarfs split the other two-thirds.Not too bad, right? Well, it is pretty bad: Doc-through-Dopey together get twice as much as Snow White. She certainly won’t live happily ever after.

The situation gets more complicated if a minor child is getting a piece. The surviving parent may not be appointed the legal guardian for the receiving child; being mother or father isn’t decisive. Periodic inventories can be required. And the child gets his or her share as a much-too-young age.

So do you really want to share ownership of your house equally with two teenage kids? It can (and would) happen.

What else can trigger this besides the financial planner’s defective signing? If particular events happen with a lawyer-drawn will. And of course, if there’s no will.

Consider the parent who recently remarried, who didn't do a new will in the midst of planning the wedding and honeymoon.

How about the parents who did the right documents for their children, but later decided to have or adopt one more . . . and the old will didn’t contemplate more kids.

Or the person who typed up an old will, or copied a neighbor’s will. The document may have had the title "Will" at the top, but it wasn’t any good.

In each of these examples, the surviving spouse took it in the ear: take a half, take a third. Do not take all, do not pass "Go," do not collect even an extra $200.

 

The bottom line: having a document-gone-bad, or no document, can mean you'll be looking to your kids (or your dead spouse’s kids) for spending money, instead of the other way around.